Learning Research News
By Associate Professor (Reader) Chris Jackson, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia

 

This is Chris Jackson's Learning Newsletter provided by 64.78.11.144

 

What's Biology Got to Do With Learning at Work?

Answer : Everything

Because some of the things I am about to say may stretch the boundaries of people who have been force fed principles of experiential learning, I feel the need to start by reminding you that I have spent nearly 15 years as a faculty academic researching and consulting on personality and learning.

Models of learning by experience have been the rage for quite a few years. Various models have been developed based on the work of Kolb in the 1980s.

Experiential models of learning advocate that people learn by experience and are easy to change.

This is simply not true.

Dr Chris Jackson

Contact
Everything you need to know about biological and cognitive basis of learning
on-line SWOT for sharing your decisions with your team

People are not easy to change.

 

Let's look at a few classic examples:

  • Personality - it remains highly consistent throughout life.
  • Clinical interventions - it takes skilled practitioners and careful therapy to make even a small difference and the most effective therapy is based on changing peoples' cognitions using CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy).
  • Recidivism of criminals - always high, especially for some groups of people.

Experiential learning models implicitly argue that 'we are what we learn.' They fail to take into account the biological hindrances and learned cognitions which can limit and redirect our learning experiences. The reality is that some people are not easy to change, some find it easier to change than others, and some change for the better and some for the worse.

The learning cycle tells us at best about peoples' learning preferences. This tells us about how we learn by experience, but this has got little to do with telling us about whether we can learn and what we can learn. Discovering how we learn by experience tells us superficial information that is at best harmless fun; finding out about whether we can learn and what we can learn tells us about fundamental issues related to development, change and performance.

This is why we must understand the biological drive to learn.

Biological drive tell us whether a person is exploratory and curious or has little interest in learning. We know from the detailed work of Professor Zuckerman that the basis for this is highly biological with most research investigating dopamine pathways of the brain. Some research this year even identifies specific genes that are related to dopamine production and are related with this drive to learn. If we do not have the biological systems in place that are oriented towards self-development learning then there are simply limitations on the amount that we want to learn.

In short, understanding the biological basis of learning is fundamental to any effective model of learning. This tells us key information about who is interested in change and, because it is a biological component of learning, that this element of learning will be difficult to change.

Take a closer look at this exciting new model of learning today!

 

Yours truly

Chris Jackson

© Chris Jackson, 2006

Want to share this material with others?

Yes, you can!....forward this newsletter to your friends and colleagues. If you know someone who would benefit from reading this, go ahead and spread the word!

Thank you!


Cymeon Website
64.78.11.144

. .